This is why I remain torn about abortion. I suppose it's the "lesser of two evils". Better is not getting pregnant in the first place. I may be a conservative Christian, but I'll make sure my kids know how to use a condom, just in case they ever need it.
I guess the conclusion of whether the doctor's telling is a touching example of saving lives, an attempt at rationalization for taking them, or somewhere in between depends on which values one uses in their thinking. That is to say: 1. How much is a fetal human "worth" compared to a born human; 2. What are the odds of death involved for the parties in the situation; 3. How much is quality of life worth compared to life?
While we probably could not seriously find an objective and true value for the above, perhaps (BIG perhaps) if we as a society could at least talk about it in these cold terms, we could be able to sit down and really hash out mutually agreeable and beneficial solutions (ex. all sides could express support & provide funding for programs that would increase post-natal quality of life instead of being afraid that any collaboration would be a "concession" to "the other side"). As it stands, our politicians and lobbyists will probably continue to create villains & heroes, thereby mobilizing & polarizing voters while doing nothing to actually better the situation for anyone involved.
Feh!
Heart disease is not a good thing, but open heart surgery is.
Unwanted pregnancy is not a good thing, but abortions are.
Re: Feh!
Re: Feh!
Re: Feh!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I like you, so I won't kill you with my mind powers.
Re: Feh!
(Anonymous) - 2008-02-04 19:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Feh!
Re: Feh!
Re: Feh!
Re: Unless
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Careful, now
Re: Careful, now
Re: Careful, now
Re: Careful, now
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
see, that's the problem
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Fetal Calculus
That is to say:
1. How much is a fetal human "worth" compared to a born human;
2. What are the odds of death involved for the parties in the situation;
3. How much is quality of life worth compared to life?
While we probably could not seriously find an objective and true value for the above, perhaps (BIG perhaps) if we as a society could at least talk about it in these cold terms, we could be able to sit down and really hash out mutually agreeable and beneficial solutions (ex. all sides could express support & provide funding for programs that would increase post-natal quality of life instead of being afraid that any collaboration would be a "concession" to "the other side"). As it stands, our politicians and lobbyists will probably continue to create villains & heroes, thereby mobilizing & polarizing voters while doing nothing to actually better the situation for anyone involved.
The real issues
Purely talking about "cost" in terms of money,
Re: Purely talking about "cost" in terms of money,
Re: Purely talking about "cost" in terms of money,
re: 3
Re: Careful, now
Re: Careful, now
Re: The real issues
Worth vs. Cost
Re: The real issues
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Moral Agency
Re: Agency in the Story
Re: Agency in the Story
Re: Agency in the Story
Re: Agency in the Story
Re: Agency in the Story
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Fetal Calculus
Re: Ought
Re: Ought
Re: Language
Re: Language
Re: Language
Re: Language
Re: Language
Re: Language
Re: Language