Ah, I see we have entirely missed the point. kadath is saying precisely this. In both cases, there is a condition that can be corrected by medical intervention; the intervention has its own stresses, risks, and potential complications, but the existence and availability of said procedure is nonetheless infinitely preferable to the alternative.
And anonymous posting is for cowards. Own your words. Unless LJ randomly logged you off, because it does that.
Ah, I see we have entirely missed the point. kadath is saying precisely this.
It looked to me like kadath was disagreeing with etherial's original statement.
In both cases, there is a condition that can be corrected by medical intervention; the intervention has its own stresses, risks, and potential complications, but the existence and availability of said procedure is nonetheless infinitely preferable to the alternative.
and I thought her disagreement was odd because I think by etherial and kadth would agree with this.
Unless LJ randomly logged you off, because it does that.
kadath and I are quibbling over the definition of "good". Also, I was wondering who else might be commenting in my journal from Texas. I'm not surprised the answer is "no one".
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Feh!
(Anonymous) 2008-02-04 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Feh!
And anonymous posting is for cowards. Own your words. Unless LJ randomly logged you off, because it does that.
Re: Feh!
It looked to me like kadath was disagreeing with etherial's original statement.
In both cases, there is a condition that can be corrected by medical intervention; the intervention has its own stresses, risks, and potential complications, but the existence and availability of said procedure is nonetheless infinitely preferable to the alternative.
and I thought her disagreement was odd because I think by etherial and kadth would agree with this.
Unless LJ randomly logged you off, because it does that.
It did. That was me.
Re: Feh!
Re: Unless