Ah, I see we have entirely missed the point. kadath is saying precisely this.
It looked to me like kadath was disagreeing with etherial's original statement.
In both cases, there is a condition that can be corrected by medical intervention; the intervention has its own stresses, risks, and potential complications, but the existence and availability of said procedure is nonetheless infinitely preferable to the alternative.
and I thought her disagreement was odd because I think by etherial and kadth would agree with this.
Unless LJ randomly logged you off, because it does that.
kadath and I are quibbling over the definition of "good". Also, I was wondering who else might be commenting in my journal from Texas. I'm not surprised the answer is "no one".
Re: Feh!
It looked to me like kadath was disagreeing with etherial's original statement.
In both cases, there is a condition that can be corrected by medical intervention; the intervention has its own stresses, risks, and potential complications, but the existence and availability of said procedure is nonetheless infinitely preferable to the alternative.
and I thought her disagreement was odd because I think by etherial and kadth would agree with this.
Unless LJ randomly logged you off, because it does that.
It did. That was me.
Re: Feh!