etherial: Firefly Season 2 Logo (hopeless causes)
[personal profile] etherial
I was unclear in my previous post about websites. I'm not looking for a modern web 2.0 data scheme. I want a simple front page that says "Hi, we are legitimately offering you $5 for your short story and will actually pay you if we use it". What information can we provide, besides our writing guidelines, that will help assure you that your $5 short story is not going to be stolen by us?

I am currently suffering from writer's block, not an overwhelming desire to curl up in a ball twitching because I can't get the @!#$ code to work.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 04:40 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
Ahh. Though I think you misunderstood the point of the other commenters. The single most important thing you can do to convince people that your company is trustworthy is to look trustworthy. To look "professional". This is image. This is design. Not text.

And one of the fascinating bits of class semiotics online has to do exactly with what [livejournal.com profile] pezzonovante said. Most people -- most small businesses and fly-by-night operations -- when they want to throw a quicky web page up, use WordPress or other blog-based CMS to do so. See, they're pre-packaged apps that come pre-skinned. You don't need to pay a designer or have design skills for it to look "professional".

The problem is that they look like "professional" blogs. To anyone with any net-savvy, they scream "cheap, fast, and possibly illegitimate".

I have a strong professional opinion as to what product you should be using to do this the moment you get beyond one page, because evaluating CMSes is one of the things I do for techjob -- ask if you want it -- but one way or another, you're going to need to attend to design.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catya.livejournal.com
(I use Drupal, which has the advantage of being themed (like skinned), but is not a blog. good stuff.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 04:46 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
Drupal is a portal package, which is the identical problem from a different angle. Also, I hate it deeply.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catya.livejournal.com
I'm not sure what you mean by portal package :) but perhaps not here for religious wars :)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] etherial.livejournal.com
I certainly am thinking about our long-term needs, but we're just not willing to frontload everything. While I appreciate the reminders re: blogotype and wikis, our short term needs for the webpage are "get our submission guidelines up and our name out there". I mean, there's generally a 2-month lead time on those $5 short stories - something that says "work in progress" is not out of line here.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 04:57 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
You're missing the point. This isn't about CMSes -- a technology you clearly have no idea about (hint: it has nothing to do with wikis) -- this has to do with design. You know: fonts, colors, layout. If you want to do a single, stand-alone HTML page, that's fine, but if you want people to trust you it had better not look like it was cobbled together by a 12 year old and a box of markers, so you will either need to have design skills or find a designer.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 09:02 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
Well, Comic Sans is a good start, but you have to use at least three distinct fonts if you really want to impress people.

Animated gifs and that CSS sparkle effect are also de rigueur.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] calygrey.livejournal.com
...but you have to use at least three distinct fonts if you really want to impress people

Good God. No you don't. Where did that rule appear from?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 11:11 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
You just blew your saving throw vs. sarcasm. (The curve was one comment back.) Roll 1d20 against the critical hit "irony" table for damage.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-25 11:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] calygrey.livejournal.com
You just blew your saving throw vs. sarcasm.

Oh my God. I am so very stupid.

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags