Cheques

[etherial]

One of my responsibilities this week (my direct boss being in Florida and all) is to write the company checks (but not sign them. boo hoo). This means I will be writing them out manually. I'm having difficulty if I should write them out in the manner I do, or in a more traditional fashion.

The differences between me and everybody else:

1. I write AD on all my christian calendar dates, or at least those that include the year, which would mean all the ones on these checks.

2. I write all my dollar amounts (the words, not the numerals) as mixed fractions. Thus, $150.50 would be One-hundred Fifty and a half dollars. The idea for this originated from the fact that I like writing out as much as I can, and that every check I've ever seen already has the word "dollars" printed on it, so it would be silly to write so it says "One-hundred fifty dollars and fifty cents dollars."

Comments

Re: On the Writing of Cheques

[mpgalvin.livejournal.com]

on 1) AD vs CE? specifically christian? since you're already assuming the person processing the check can read english, you can likely assume they'll default to the same calendar you're using.

on 2) 00/100. i thought it was standard form. of course, my standard form of writing on checks (which i use for clarity's sake) is all-caps oldschool computer-inspired. i just make the first letter bigger to denote capitalization. :)

Re: CE

[etherial.livejournal.com]

Why did the Current Era begin at the birth of Christ? What was so wrong with recording the idea that every year came from God? Why have we secularized a Calendar that came into existence because a Pope was divinely inspired with an unevenly monthed calendar whose days and months are named after Roman Emperors, and all manner of Pagan gods?

If we pretend these things don't exist, then we lose some of our cultural heritage. We can't forget where our everyday thoughts and ideas come from, or else we'll never be able to even think to change them. I'm not saying we can't use it, I'm just saying that since other calendars have been in use for millennia, and new ones are being developed all the time, we don't need to marry ourselves to the idea that this is the only one.

jeebus built my sundial danng a dang ding-y ding-y

[mpgalvin.livejournal.com]

well, calenders *do* need a starting point. so that's why. it's gotta be SOMETHING, so why not what people already picked for that AD thingy? that way the conversion between the two is pretty direct, no math.

yeah, and that calendar has 7tober 8tober 9vember and 10vember as months 9 10 11 and 12. real inspired, that. :P at this point, i'd sign it all of as "tradition!"

yeah, we could all keep time by the Unix Epoch, but i just don't wanna be arsed to do the math. *pictures people doing binary on their hands* nope, sounds like a big pain to do it that way.

Re: CE

[bonisagus.livejournal.com]

CE is not the Current Era. It's the Common Era btw.

Re: CE

[etherial.livejournal.com]

I've never heard it called Common Era before. What's so common about it?

Re: CE

[bonisagus.livejournal.com]

It's the Religion Neutral way of saying AD. It's the Common Era because it's the one we are in now I guess. I don't know why they changed it either to be honest.