Death by NDA
Oct. 17th, 2005 09:34 amSome of you may have been aware that I was starting a new job today. It was to examine calculus problems for math textbooks and create example solutions and guided practice. Unfortunately, that job suffered a Death by NDA. The NDA included a Non-Competition Clause. Pro-Corporate-types consider this an attempt by the company to ensure that its employees don't quit and start up a competitor using the knowledge they gained in their job. Pro-Employee-types consider this an attempt to prevent people from being able to afford to quit their jobs. In general, I object to Non-Competition Clauses, but wouldn't have minded this one too much were it not for some of the language. Because I would be working on math textbooks, the Contract could prevent me from pursuing the manufacturers of these math textbooks for use in my classroom. As a matter of fact, the Contract could prevent me from even using these math textbooks for use in my classroom. When I brought my concerns to my would-be-supervisor's supervisor, he punted me out of the building.
Greg: 0
Evil Evil Contracts: 1
FLAWLESS VICTORY
Greg: 0
Evil Evil Contracts: 1
FLAWLESS VICTORY
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-17 01:53 pm (UTC)not exactly.
Date: 2005-10-17 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-17 02:06 pm (UTC)http://employment.findlaw.com/employment/employment-employee-job-loss/employment-employee-non-compete.html
Are they alleging that you received specific training in examining calculus problems from the company at the company's expense, and that this gives you a competitive advantage to the detriment of the company?
I can't really comment in any further productive fashion without the specific language of the NCA. Mind posting it?
I'll try.
Date: 2005-10-17 03:07 pm (UTC)Re: I'll try.
Date: 2005-10-17 07:15 pm (UTC)Are you still on good terms with this company?
Re: I'll try.
Date: 2005-10-18 04:11 am (UTC)I believe I am still on good terms with the staffing firm. I would never work for the publishing company.
Been there, done that. :/
Date: 2005-10-17 03:40 pm (UTC)Re: Been there, done that. :/
Date: 2005-10-17 03:44 pm (UTC)Re: Been there, done that. :/
Date: 2005-10-17 07:14 pm (UTC)Re: Been there, done that. :/
Date: 2005-10-17 07:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-17 06:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-17 07:26 pm (UTC)Oh well, you have Andrew's contact information, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-18 01:44 am (UTC)